Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|
Choose an application
Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Animal culture --- Animals in art. --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Elevage --- Animaux dans l'art --- History. --- Histoire
Choose an application
Biodiversity --- Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Excavations (Archaeology) --- Archaeology --- Biodiversité --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Archéologie --- Methodology. --- Méthodologie --- Europe --- Europe --- Antiquities. --- Antiquités
Choose an application
Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Antiquities, Prehistoric --- Neolithic period --- Excavations (Archaeology) --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Antiquités préhistoriques --- Néolithique --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Provence (France) --- Antiquities. --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Antiquités préhistoriques --- Néolithique --- Fouilles (Archéologie)
Choose an application
Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Excavations (Archaeology) --- Human-animal relationships --- Domestic animals --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Relations homme-animal --- Animaux domestiques --- History --- Histoire --- Tornio (Finland) --- Tornio (Finlande) --- Antiquities --- Antiquités --- Antiquities. --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Antiquités
Choose an application
In recent years, scholars have emphasized the need for more holistic subsistence analyses, and collaborative publications towards this endeavor have become more numerous in the literature. However, there are relatively few attempts to qualitatively integrate zooarchaeological (animal) and paleoethnobotanical (plant) data, and even fewer attempts to quantitatively integrate these two types of subsistence evidence. Given the vastly different methods used in recovering and quantifying these data, not to mention their different preservational histories, it is no wonder that so few have undertaken this problem. Integrating Zooarchaeology and Paleoethnobotany takes the lead in tackling this important issue by addressing the methodological limitations of data integration, proposing new methods and innovative ways of using established methods, and highlighting case studies that successfully employ these methods to shed new light on ancient foodways. The volume challenges the perception that plant and animal foodways are distinct and contends that the separation of the analysis of archaeological plant and animal remains sets up a false dichotomy between these portions of the diet. In advocating qualitative and quantitative data integration, the volume establishes a clear set of methods for (1) determining the suitability of data integration in any particular case, and (2) carrying out an integrated qualitative or quantitative approach.
Animal remains (Archaeology). --- Paleoethnobotany. --- Prehistoric peoples -- Food. --- Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Paleoethnobotany --- Prehistoric peoples --- Food habits --- Archaeology --- History & Archaeology --- Food --- History --- Methodology --- Archaeology. --- Paleobotany. --- Fossil ethnobotany --- Palaeoethnobotany --- Fossil botany --- Palaeobotany --- Archeology --- Archaeozoology --- Zooarchaeology --- Zoology in archaeology --- Social sciences. --- Plant science. --- Botany. --- Zoology. --- Social Sciences. --- Plant Sciences. --- Anthropology --- Auxiliary sciences of history --- Antiquities --- Ethnobotany --- Paleobotany --- Plant remains (Archaeology) --- Botany --- Paleontology --- Bones --- Animal paleopathology --- Botanical science --- Phytobiology --- Phytography --- Phytology --- Plant biology --- Plant science --- Biology --- Natural history --- Plants --- Animals --- Floristic botany
Choose an application
Environmental archaeology --- Social archaeology --- Iron age --- Excavations (Archaeology) --- Archéologie de l'environnement --- Archéologie sociale --- Age du fer --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Congresses. --- Congresses --- Congrès --- Great Britain --- Ireland --- Grande-Bretagne --- Irlande --- Antiquities --- Antiquités --- Human remains (Archaeology) --- Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Bronze age --- Archéologie de l'environnement --- Archéologie sociale --- Fouilles (Archéologie) --- Congrès --- Antiquités --- Environmental archaeology - Great Britain - Congresses --- Social archaeology - Great Britain - Congresses --- Iron age - Great Britain - Congresses --- Excavations (Archaeology) - Great Britain - Congresses --- Human remains (Archaeology) - Great Britain - Congresses --- Animal remains (Archaeology) - Great Britain - Congresses --- Great Britain - Antiquities - Congresses
Choose an application
Mummified animals --- Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Imaging systems in archaeology --- Mummies --- Animaux momifié --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Imagerie en archéologie --- Momies --- Radiography --- Radiographie --- Imaging systems in archaeology. --- Animaux momifié --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Imagerie en archéologie --- Animal mummies --- Archaeological imaging systems --- Archaeology
Choose an application
In recent years, scholars have emphasized the need for more holistic subsistence analyses, and collaborative publications towards this endeavor have become more numerous in the literature. However, there are relatively few attempts to qualitatively integrate zooarchaeological (animal) and paleoethnobotanical (plant) data, and even fewer attempts to quantitatively integrate these two types of subsistence evidence. Given the vastly different methods used in recovering and quantifying these data, not to mention their different preservational histories, it is no wonder that so few have undertaken this problem. Integrating Zooarchaeology and Paleoethnobotany takes the lead in tackling this important issue by addressing the methodological limitations of data integration, proposing new methods and innovative ways of using established methods, and highlighting case studies that successfully employ these methods to shed new light on ancient foodways. The volume challenges the perception that plant and animal foodways are distinct and contends that the separation of the analysis of archaeological plant and animal remains sets up a false dichotomy between these portions of the diet. In advocating qualitative and quantitative data integration, the volume establishes a clear set of methods for (1) determining the suitability of data integration in any particular case, and (2) carrying out an integrated qualitative or quantitative approach.
Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Paleoethnobotany. --- Prehistoric peoples --- Food habits --- Archaeology --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Paléoethnobotanique --- Homme préhistorique --- Habitudes alimentaires --- Archéologie --- Food. --- History. --- Methodology. --- Alimentation --- Histoire --- Méthodologie --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Paléoethnobotanique --- Homme préhistorique --- Archéologie --- Méthodologie --- EPUB-LIV-FT LIVHUMAI SPRINGER-B --- Paleoethnobotany --- Food --- Agriculture, Prehistoric --- Fossil ethnobotany --- Palaeoethnobotany --- Ethnobotany --- Paleobotany --- Plant remains (Archaeology) --- Archaeozoology --- Zooarchaeology --- Zoology in archaeology --- Bones --- Animal paleopathology --- Methodology --- History --- Primitive societies
Choose an application
Animal remains (Archaeology) --- Social archaeology. --- Human-animal relationships. --- Colonies. --- Rites and ceremonies. --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Archéologie sociale --- Relations homme-animal --- Colonies --- Rites et cérémonies --- Restes d'animaux (Archéologie) --- Archéologie sociale --- Rites et cérémonies --- Human-animal relationships --- Rites and ceremonies --- Social archaeology --- Archaeology --- Ceremonies --- Cult --- Cultus --- Ecclesiastical rites and ceremonies --- Religious ceremonies --- Religious rites --- Rites of passage --- Traditions --- Ritualism --- Manners and customs --- Mysteries, Religious --- Ritual --- Animal-human relationships --- Animal-man relationships --- Animals and humans --- Human beings and animals --- Man-animal relationships --- Relationships, Human-animal --- Animals --- Anti-colonialism --- Colonial affairs --- Colonialism --- Neocolonialism --- Imperialism --- Non-self-governing territories --- Colonization --- Archaeozoology --- Zooarchaeology --- Zoology in archaeology --- Bones --- Animal paleopathology --- Methodology
Listing 1 - 9 of 9 |
Sort by
|